Lesson Plan 2

Assignment Sheet
Literacy Narrative
Learning Objectives:
- To use conventions, such as descriptive language, that are connected to this autobiographical piece.
- To reflect on significant experiences related to reading and/or writing.
- Engage in the process of writing including pre-writing, drafting and revision.
- To collaborate with peers through review.
Instructions:
Having watched the PowerPoint and Tim O’Brien video, and read and discussed “Following the Rules—A Digital Literacy Narrative,” you are now ready to begin writing your own Literacy Narrative.
Your Literacy Narrative should be 3 to 4 pages in length. Times New Roman 12 point font, double-spaced, and in MLA style.
It should include the features of a Literacy Narrative that were outlined in the PowerPoint including, but not limited to, descriptive detail that appeals to the senses and explaining why the experience you share was a significant one, early on in the piece.
Both the rubric and the peer review template have been attached to this assignment sheet. Please look both over. I will announce the peer partners in the next class.
To get started:
- Brainstorm: Think of five experiences that you have had with reading, writing, and/or social media. It can be a positive or negative experience. (i.e., book fair, favorite book, writing aptitude test, bullying via social media.)
- Next, engage in a free write. Look at your list of five experiences and choose the one that you remember the most about right now. Then, for five solid minutes, write down everything you remember about that experience but do not be concerned with grammar or spelling. Just write!
- Once your free write is complete, read it over. Congratulations! You now have a good starting off point for what I know is going to be a powerful piece of writing.
The Peer Review:
Your Rough Draft must be brought to class on [insert date]. Please bring two copies (one for me, the other for your partner). You will peer review during the allotted time, adhering to the template that I have provided. Please remember to be honest, yet kind and to always address the positives first.
The Final Draft:
Having received feedback from your peer and myself, you will then begin the revision process. Although there will be one writing workshop in class devoted to this, the expectation is that the majority of the revision process will be completed outside of class. The final draft of the Literacy Narrative will be due on [insert date].
Journal Entry:
In your writing journal, please reflect on the example Literacy Narrative that you read for me and your experience writing your own. The entry should be one page, double-spaced. You should address any challenges that you had during the writing process, any “WOW” moments, and strive to make text to text connections. The journal entry is due on [insert date].
Rubric
IDEAS AND DEVELOPMENT:
_____Exceptional (4): The narrative is always focused and clear. Meets the needs of the audience. It is enhanced by rich, vivid detail that holds the interest of the reader and places the reader in the experience with the author. The narrative is well written and fully developed. The importance of the event is explicit.
_____Proficient (3): The narrative is for the most part focused and clear and usually meets the needs of the audience. It has some detail that attracts the reader’s attention. The significance of the event is obvious.
_____Adequate (2): The narrative is somewhat focused and clear. The needs of the audience are not met consistently. Detail is not vibrant, nor does it hold the reader’s attention. The story is not fully developed, and the importance of the event is not clear.
_____Inadequate (1): The narrative lacks clarity and focus. Little to no descriptive detail. The narrative is not engaging to the reader. The story is poorly developed, and it is not clear why the event is important.
ORGANIZATION:
_____Exceptional (4): Ideas connect clearly to one another. The narrative flows very well, holding the reader’s interest.
_____Proficient (3): The narrative is engaging and possesses a structure that is logical. _____Adequate (2): The narrative has structure, but the organization is not consistent. Not easy to follow.
_____Inadequate (1): The narrative has a structure that is confusing. The narrative does not flow well, and the reader can not follow it.
VOICE:
_____Exceptional(4): The tone guides the narrative. The narrative is strongly engaging
_____Proficient (3): The writer’s personality is evident in the tone of the piece. An interesting read.
_____Adequate (2): The tone of the piece is not genuine. It lacks authenticity.
_____Inadequate (1): The tone does not engage the reader.
STYLE AND CONVENTIONS:
_____Exceptional (4): Vocabulary and word use are strongly varied. Sentence structure is solid. Few to no errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc.
_____Proficient (3): Vocabulary and word use are solid. Sentence structure is competent. Some errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc. present
_____Adequate (2): Vocabulary and word use are not impressive. Sentence structure is average. Significant errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc..
_____Inadequate (1): Vocabulary and word use are incorrect. Sentence structure is not clear. Many errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc.. contribute to piece not being readable
Final Score: ________
This Literacy Narrative Assignment was inspired by four pedagogies: Expressive, Process, Collaboration, and Diversity. Additionally, since the example given to the students to read focuses on Digital Literacy, there is a 21st Century component to the assignment as well.
I was moved to create this assignment for several reasons, but the most important one was that as an educator I have always found that the writing that seems to intimidate students the least is autobiographical writing. Also, that for my ELL students, they have a wealth of experiences related to reading and/or writing in America. These personal truths are often deeply moving because their narratives are rooted around feeling marginalized and how they overcame that to experience triumph . . . whether that victory came in the form of passing a proficiency test or testing out of a special reading class.
This empowerment that comes from expressing their personal truth is connected to the idea of voice and therefore, the Expressivist pedagogy that is anchored by the theorists like Peter Elbow. The students are encouraged to write from their memory and share a significant experience, whether it be negative or positive. They connect with themselves and society to offer their most authentic voice, without being constrained with a more formal approach to language and writing.
However, although I very much want them to share their voice, and believe in encouraging them to cultivate their voice, I also want them to “buy” into the process of writing, because personal narratives won’t be the only type of writing they ever do . . . inside or outside the classroom. So, that is where Process pedagogy comes into play. Within this assignment, students engage in pre-writing, drafting and revision. Steps that will help them become better writers over time, but only if they engage in it. Incorporating aspects of process theory into a theoretically “fun” writing assignment seemed to me the best way to have them engage with those steps.
Meanwhile, the peer review component speaks to Collaboration pedagogy and the notion that by interacting with one another, students will strengthen not only their writing skills, but their critical thinking skills as well. Not only do I believe that collaboration works in this regard, but I also feel that it is one of the most transferable skills that we teach in the classroom. Yet, it is up to the instructor to provide strict guidance for this endeavor. Unfortunately, peer review does not come naturally to everyone. Especially students who struggle with their own writing. Therefore, I always include a peer feedback template and insist that they adhere to it.
Since everyone’s story is different and no two voices are alike, this assignment also has ties to Diversity pedagogy. As I stated previously, literacy means a different experience for the ELL than it does for a native English speaker, a native English speaker with LD, or a man versus a woman. So, this assignment offers a contact space, where different authentic experiences can be shared through writing and discussed through collaboration/peer review.
Lastly, because the assignment does incorporate an example of a narrative that happens to be a Digital Literacy Narrative, another door is opened to students . . . one that would most likely appeal to the 21st Century Learner, who also happens to be a Digital native. They could choose to also write a Digital Literacy Narrative in the traditional sense, or over time, as I evolve this assignment, I can see it morphing into a multi-modality project that could go from essay to blog or vlog. Additionally, I have added an option to do the literacy narrative on an experience with social media.
In closing, I would like to say that I feel this project is pretty well-rounded. It incorporates several theories with some best practices including pre-writing, drafting, revision, peer review, and journaling.